Share news in:
7 February 2022
Anna Sanecka-Duin
Anna Sanecka-Duin

Unconventional γδ T cells as allogeneic cellular products in immunotherapies for cancer.

In our previous blog post, we described a possible cellular source to generate “universal” donor cells for off-the shelf application in cancer immunotherapy. We are following our discussion on this topic with unconventional subsets of T cells that do not require extensive genome editing for safe administration. In particular, we will focus on a unique gamma delta T cell (γδ T cell) subpopulation that has received a lot of attention in cancer immunotherapy over the past decade. [1, 2]

γδ T cells are a distinct subgroup of T cells that contain T cell receptors (TCRs) made of one γ chain and one δ chain with diverse structural and functional heterogeneity. γδ T cells are classified in between the adaptive and the innate immune system, as they exhibit a faster immune response compared to αβ T cells. [3] γδ T cells are considered cytotoxic, anti-tumor lymphocytes with a high capacity of IFNγ and TNFα cytokines secretion (Fig. 1). Several characteristics make these cells attractive candidates for cancer immunotherapy. In contrast to conventional αβ T cells, their activation does not rely on the recognition of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-dependent antigen presentation, which allow them to be easily transferred between individuals in an allogeneic setting without the risk of causing Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD). The use of MHC-independent γδ T cells might be particularly effective against antigen-negative or MHC-low tumor cells. Moreover, extensive use of semi-invariant or invariant γ and δ chains that dominate their unique TCR repertoire can be broadly applicable in TCR-based allogeneic cell transfer. Their sensing of cancer cells depends on more ubiquitous changes observed across many individuals, as their molecular targets are expressed on a wide variety of tumor transformed cells.[1] In addition, γδ T cells express CD16 and participate in inducing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.[4] Lastly, their pattern of cytokine secretion may present a lower risk of cytokine release syndrome.

Here, we will briefly summarize the stage of preclinical and clinical development and discuss opportunities and challenges that these types of cells can offer for off-the-shelf products for cancer therapies.

Figure 1. Antitumor properties of γδ T cells.
 γδTCR ligands such as phosphoantigens can bind to γδTCR. Stress-induced molecules, including MICA/B and Rae-1, can bind to NK receptors such as NKG2D. This ligation induces activation of antitumor γδ T cells. Proinflammatory cytokines, such as IFNγ and TNF, can further activate antitumor immunity by inducing MHC molecules on the tumor cell surface or by affecting other immune cells. The upregulation of cytotoxic molecules such as granzymes and perforin can directly kill tumor cells. In addition to these receptors, FcR-mediated ADCC, FAS-FASL, and TRAIL ligation can also induce direct cytotoxicity against tumor cells. γδ T cells can promote B cells to produce IgE, which has an antitumor effect. 
Fig. 1: Network of antitumor γδ T cells. | Experimental & Molecular Medicine (


Translating γδ T cells into cancer cell therapies

High frequencies of intratumoral γδ T cells represent one of the most favorable prognostic markers in different cancers. Using the cell- type identification by estimating relative subsets of known RNA transcript (CIBERSORT) algorithms, an extensive analysis of immune subset transcriptomic signatures from 18,000 tumors revealed that γδ T cells are the immune subset most significantly associated with a favorable prognosis.[5] Human γδ T cells are broadly divided into two main Vδ1 and Vδ2 subsets based on their TCRδ-chain expression.[3] The potential of γδTCR diversity is however thought to surpass the diversity of αβTCRs. The semi-invariant Vγ9Vδ2 T cells that dominate the γδ T cells in peripheral blood are common targets for γδ T cell-based immunotherapies. Other clones perceived as non-Vγ9Vδ2 γδ T cells comprise a plethora of unique rearrangements of Vδ1 and Vδ3,4,5,6,7,8 pairings with diverse TRG segments (Vγ2,3,4,5,8, and non-invariant Vγ9) that can adopt highly individual forms of immune surveillance.[6-8] The polyclonal repertoire of non-Vγ9Vδ2 γδ T cells which most likely target different ligands would result in diverse and difficult to control off-the shelf products. On the other hand, their wide repertoire may have applications for next generation personalized cancer care. In homeostatic condition, Vδ2 T cells are mainly enriched in the peripheral blood where they represent about 1-5% of all circulating T cells and recognize specifically microbial or stress- or tumor-induced phosphoantigens (PhAgs).[9] In recent years, different and robust protocols have been established to activate and expand both Vδ1 and Vδ2 T cell subsets from peripheral blood, thus, allowing the acquisition of sufficient numbers of cells for utilization in clinical settings.[10, 11] The PhAgs-reactive Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are relatively easier to expand than Vδ1 T cells, due the combinatorial use of both IL-2 and aminobisphosphonates like zoledronate (ZOL), which are able to induce Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion in vitro or in vivo by systemic administration of ZOL (Fig. 2). 

While the safety of γδ T cell activation in patients has been proven, and the pharmacodynamics of PhAgs administered to humans has been established, the results from these studies have been disappointing.[12-16] The activation and adoptive transfer of expanded in vitro Vγ9Vδ2 T cells was shown to be safe; but also failed.[17, 18] Thus, several aspects still need to be considered carefully. For instance, which ‘variant’ of PhAgs constitutes the major natural biologically active molecule remains to be determined. In alternative, a novel strategy for in vivo activation of tumor-reactive Vδ2 T cells is the therapeutic application of a humanized anti-BTN3A1 mAb.[19] In fact, a clinical trial with such an antibody (ICT01) has just been started (NCT04243499).

On the other hand, hypoxia and chemotherapy also render γδ T cells fragile.[20, 21] Moreover, targeting coinhibitory/stimulatory molecules also might be a good strategy for reinvigorating γδ T cells. For example, anti-CTLA4 antibody treatment increased the frequency of Vδ2 T cells in melanoma patients.[22] Notably, recently widespread expression of the NKG2A checkpoint in human Vδ2 T cells was also demonstrated.[23] On the basis of these new evidences, several new clinical trials are currently ongoing in both solid tumors including breast (NCT03183206, NCT02781805), lung (NCT03183232), liver (NCT03183219), pancreatic (NCT03180437) and bladder (NCT02753309) cancers, and hematological tumors (NCT03533816, NTR6541).[2] In addition, different therapeutic strategies to treat cancers with γδ T cells or extracted receptors from γδ T cells have been developed, through both academic and commercial partners in the field. These approaches are based on the principle of either recruiting available γδ T cells with approved drugs or overcoming polarization towards a tolerogenic profile by inducing the expression of activating molecules through defined in vitro stimulation methods followed by adoptive transfer.

Alternatively, genetic engineering of γδ T cells or the expression of defined tumor- reactive γδTCRs on the surface of αβ T cells are explored in order to overcome the functional constraints linked to γδ T cells (Fig. 2). αβ T cells transduced with γδTCRs (TEGs), enable selecting for the Vγ9Vδ2 TCR with the highest affinity, or for non-Vδ2 γδTCRs, and thereby can target a broad range of tumors in the personalized setting. Using Vγ9Vδ2 TCRs TEGs have been shown to target leukemic stem cells and eliminate primary multiple myeloma in a 3D bone marrow model.[24, 25] Interestingly, CD4+ T cells reprogrammed with a defined Vγ9Vδ2 TCR, not only present cytotoxic properties, but also have the ability to mature professional antigen- presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells (DCs).[26] TEGs expressing a high-affinity Vγ9Vδ2 TCR have been manufactured under GMP conditions and a clinical trial exploring their safety and tolerability are currently being used in a phase I clinical trial in patients with relapsed and refractory AML and multiple myeloma (NTR6541).[27]

γδ T cells are also currently being explored as carriers for chimeric antigen receptor (CARs) T cells. Recently, a new protocol to use γδ T lymphocytes as a platform for CAR-T cells was described by Rozenbaum et al.[28] This pre-clinical study demonstrated the ability to effectively transduce and expand γδ T cells with a CAR targeting CD19. γδCAR T cells were effective against CD19+ tumor cell lines, both in vivo and in vitro. Attempts of γδ T cell transduction with CARs have been also reported previously, however, in this work, a head-to-head comparison of the γδCAR T cells to CAR-T cells shows comparable transduction efficacy and in vitro cytotoxicity against CD19 positive targets. On the other hand, their in vivo effect was profound but inferior to that of CAR-T cells, suggesting that the clinical applicability of γδCAR T cells remains to be tested.

Fig. 2. Antitumor therapies using γδ T cells are currently being developed. PBMCs from patients can be expanded under TCR- and cytokine-stimulating conditions. Expanded γδ T cells can kill tumor cells in vitro. Patient-derived cells can be transduced with engineered γδTCR. γδ CAR-T cells have the potential to be used for therapy. γδTCR-transduced αβ T cells (TEGs) are thought to be effective therapeutic agents. Injection of antibodies against costimulatory molecules or anti-inhibitory molecules can be used to reinvigorate γδ T cells. Reagents, such as zoledronate, can be used to activate γδ T cells de novo. 
(From Park, J.H., and Lee, H.K. (2021). Function of gammadelta T cells in tumor immunology and their application to cancer therapy. Exp Mol Med 53, 318-327; Fig. 2: Clinical implication of using γδ T cells. | Experimental & Molecular Medicine (

Vγ9Vδ2 T cells can also be redirected against tumor cells with bispecific antibodies (BITEs). In this regard, the (HER2)2xCD16 BITE has been used to redirect CD16+ Vγ9Vδ2 T cells against Her2+ tumor cells that were killed with very high efficiency.[29]

Taken together, there are various strategies available for the in vivo activation and targeting of γδ T cells and for the adoptive transfer of in vitro expanded γδ T cells. This opens up the perspective in the development of γδ T cell-based allogeneic “off the shelf” products that can be manufactured and stored until required for immunotherapy. Support for this idea is evident from the growing interest of several companies that are pursuing this strategy by exploring and optimizing the immunotherapeutic potential of γδ T cells.[30]


  1. Park JH, Lee HK. Function of gammadelta T cells in tumor immunology and their application to cancer therapy. Exp Mol Med 2021; 53(3):318-327.
  2. Sebestyen Z, Prinz I, Dechanet-Merville J, Silva-Santos B, Kuball J. Translating gammadelta (gammadelta) T cells and their receptors into cancer cell therapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020; 19(3):169-184.
  3. Vantourout P, Hayday A. Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of gammadelta T cells to immunology. Nat Rev Immunol 2013; 13(2):88-100.
  4. Tokuyama H, Hagi T, Mattarollo SR, Morley J, Wang Q, So HF, et al. V gamma 9 V delta 2 T cell cytotoxicity against tumor cells is enhanced by monoclonal antibody drugs–rituximab and trastuzumab. Int J Cancer 2008; 122(11):2526-2534.
  5. Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, Bratman SV, Feng W, Kim D, et al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med 2015; 21(8):938-945.
  6. Lee HW, Chung YS, Kim TJ. Heterogeneity of Human gammadelta T Cells and Their Role in Cancer Immunity. Immune Netw 2020; 20(1):e5.
  7. Pellicci DG, Uldrich AP, Le Nours J, Ross F, Chabrol E, Eckle SB, et al. The molecular bases of delta/alphabeta T cell-mediated antigen recognition. J Exp Med 2014; 211(13):2599-2615.
  8. Tan L, Fichtner AS, Bruni E, Odak I, Sandrock I, Bubke A, et al. A fetal wave of human type 3 effector gammadelta cells with restricted TCR diversity persists into adulthood. Sci Immunol 2021; 6(58).
  9. Legut M, Cole DK, Sewell AK. The promise of gammadelta T cells and the gammadelta T cell receptor for cancer immunotherapy. Cell Mol Immunol 2015; 12(6):656-668.
  10. Almeida AR, Correia DV, Fernandes-Platzgummer A, da Silva CL, da Silva MG, Anjos DR, et al. Delta One T Cells for Immunotherapy of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Clinical-Grade Expansion/Differentiation and Preclinical Proof of Concept. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22(23):5795-5804.
  11. Peters C, Kouakanou L, Oberg HH, Wesch D, Kabelitz D. In vitro expansion of Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cells for immunotherapy. Methods Enzymol 2020; 631:223-237.
  12. Bennouna J, Levy V, Sicard H, Senellart H, Audrain M, Hiret S, et al. Phase I study of bromohydrin pyrophosphate (BrHPP, IPH 1101), a Vgamma9Vdelta2 T lymphocyte agonist in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2010; 59(10):1521-1530.
  13. Kunzmann V, Smetak M, Kimmel B, Weigang-Koehler K, Goebeler M, Birkmann J, et al. Tumor-promoting versus tumor-antagonizing roles of gammadelta T cells in cancer immunotherapy: results from a prospective phase I/II trial. J Immunother 2012; 35(2):205-213.
  14. Lang JM, Kaikobad MR, Wallace M, Staab MJ, Horvath DL, Wilding G, et al. Pilot trial of interleukin-2 and zoledronic acid to augment gammadelta T cells as treatment for patients with refractory renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2011; 60(10):1447-1460.
  15. Meraviglia S, Eberl M, Vermijlen D, Todaro M, Buccheri S, Cicero G, et al. In vivo manipulation of Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cells with zoledronate and low-dose interleukin-2 for immunotherapy of advanced breast cancer patients. Clin Exp Immunol 2010; 161(2):290-297.
  16. Pressey JG, Adams J, Harkins L, Kelly D, You Z, Lamb LS, Jr. In vivo expansion and activation of gammadelta T cells as immunotherapy for refractory neuroblastoma: A phase 1 study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95(39):e4909.
  17. Handgretinger R, Schilbach K. The potential role of gammadelta T cells after allogeneic HCT for leukemia. Blood 2018; 131(10):1063-1072.
  18. Wilhelm M, Smetak M, Schaefer-Eckart K, Kimmel B, Birkmann J, Einsele H, et al. Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of haploidentical gammadelta T cells. J Transl Med 2014; 12:45.
  19. Harly C, Guillaume Y, Nedellec S, Peigne CM, Monkkonen H, Monkkonen J, et al. Key implication of CD277/butyrophilin-3 (BTN3A) in cellular stress sensing by a major human gammadelta T-cell subset. Blood 2012; 120(11):2269-2279.
  20. Bruni E, Cazzetta V, Donadon M, Cimino M, Torzilli G, Spata G, et al. Chemotherapy accelerates immune-senescence and functional impairments of Vdelta2(pos) T cells in elderly patients affected by liver metastatic colorectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7(1):347.
  21. Siegers GM, Dutta I, Lai R, Postovit LM. Functional Plasticity of Gamma Delta T Cells and Breast Tumor Targets in Hypoxia. Front Immunol 2018; 9:1367.
  22. Wistuba-Hamprecht K, Martens A, Haehnel K, Geukes Foppen M, Yuan J, Postow MA, et al. Proportions of blood-borne Vdelta1+ and Vdelta2+ T-cells are associated with overall survival of melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Eur J Cancer 2016; 64:116-126.
  23. Cazzetta V, Bruni E, Terzoli S, Carenza C, Franzese S, Piazza R, et al. NKG2A expression identifies a subset of human Vdelta2 T cells exerting the highest antitumor effector functions. Cell Rep 2021; 37(3):109871.
  24. Sebestyen Z, Scheper W, Vyborova A, Gu S, Rychnavska Z, Schiffler M, et al. RhoB Mediates Phosphoantigen Recognition by Vgamma9Vdelta2 T Cell Receptor. Cell Rep 2016; 15(9):1973-1985.
  25. Braham MVJ, Minnema MC, Aarts T, Sebestyen Z, Straetemans T, Vyborova A, et al. Cellular immunotherapy on primary multiple myeloma expanded in a 3D bone marrow niche model. Oncoimmunology 2018; 7(6):e1434465.
  26. Grunder C, van Dorp S, Hol S, Drent E, Straetemans T, Heijhuurs S, et al. gamma9 and delta2CDR3 domains regulate functional avidity of T cells harboring gamma9delta2TCRs. Blood 2012; 120(26):5153-5162.
  27. Straetemans T, Kierkels GJJ, Doorn R, Jansen K, Heijhuurs S, Dos Santos JM, et al. GMP-Grade Manufacturing of T Cells Engineered to Express a Defined gammadeltaTCR. Front Immunol 2018; 9:1062.
  28. Rozenbaum M, Meir A, Aharony Y, Itzhaki O, Schachter J, Bank I, et al. Gamma-Delta CAR-T Cells Show CAR-Directed and Independent Activity Against Leukemia. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1347.
  29. Oberg HH, Kellner C, Gonnermann D, Sebens S, Bauerschlag D, Gramatzki M, et al. Tribody [(HER2)2xCD16] Is More Effective Than Trastuzumab in Enhancing gammadelta T Cell and Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity Against HER2-Expressing Cancer Cells. Front Immunol 2018; 9:814.
  30. Kabelitz D, Serrano R, Kouakanou L, Peters C, Kalyan S. Cancer immunotherapy with gammadelta T cells: many paths ahead of us. Cell Mol Immunol 2020; 17(9):925-939.

07 October 2021
Gut microbiota’s road to clinical utilization. From bathroom to bedside.
21 March 2022
Choose targets with low risk of side effects pinpointed by Ardigen's ARDitox platform
Go up